24 November 2013 Podcast

Two weeks late but, here it is, the November 24, 2013 podcast. And it seems the production booth is plotting against me because for the second time in a row, they only have me half a show!

If the player above doesn’t work, try the following links or type the URL into your browser

20131124GOTR.mp3 OR http://gunsovertexasradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/20131124GOTR.mp3

 

Stupid decisions lead to New Mexico police shooting at mini van

 

This post is actually a few days over due but, it’s a summary of my thoughts on New Mexico police shooting at a mini van last week in Taos, New Mexico. Regardless of our opinions about Officer Elias Montoya’s decision to shoot at the van, it’s an undeniable fact that the driver, Orianna Ferrell, started the ball rolling toward this incident with the first traffic stop. The initial traffic stop was not the result of a “jackbooted thug” out to get anyone. It was a result of Ferrell’s failure to obey the speed-limit. Nothing about Officer Tony DeTavis’ demeanor in that initial stop was combative, insulting, or anything but professional, direct, and respectful. DeTavis was trying to cut Ferrell a break by not citing her for an expired license. All Ferrell had to do to be on her way was make a decision to pay the fine or fight the ticket by going to court, then sign the ticket to be released on her own recognizance. If she later found she couldn’t make the court date, she could contact the court to set a new date if needed but, by refusing to sign the ticket, she was electing to go see the magistrate right then and there. But, after receiving a lawful order to turn off her engine so DeTavis could talk to dispatch, Ferrell elected to drive off…Folks, that is a crime in 50 states. Everything that happens after that point is precipitated by that decision.

 

Ferrell pulled over when DeTavis got behind her again but, she contended that she hadn’t tried to run and acted as if she thought she could talk her way out of what was now a arrestable offense.  She can’t argue she was trying to get her children away from any crazed officers at the point because it was just her and DeTravis, yet she decided to drive away.  It can be argued that DeTavis was too nice at this point. At this point, she can readily be charged with obstruction, evading, and because she’s not complying with DeTravis’ attempts to arrest her, she can be charged with resisting arrest. It is bothersome to me that at this point, a lot of people say they are “proud” of Ferrell’s son’s actions here because he’s defending mom. But, let’s take the emotion out of this for a minute. He’s not defending mom. He’s committing a crime. He’s interfering with an officer who is lawfully executing his duties. This isn’t Selma, Alabama in 1965 and she’s not protesting “Jim Crow” or any other violation of her rights. She made a decision to turn what should have been a simple traffic citation into an arrest. It sounds strange but, the only thing I’ve seen use of force experts fault DeTravis for in this whole incident is being “too nice.” More specifically, not using enough force when appropriate and loosing control of the situation as a result. Several experts on use of force have said when Ferrell’s son initiated a fight the first time, he should have been tazed or pepper sprayed then and there. Same with mom once she actively resisted arrest. It might have been ugly and still resulted in hurt feelings but, it probably would have been a much smaller political football than the chase and shooting by Montoya.

 

On Officer Elias Montoya’s decision to shoot at Ferrell…sorry, shoot at Ferrell’s tires; for the time being, the local prosecutors are not charging him and contend that he was justified. Montoya claims he was attempting to shoot out the vehicle’s tires to prevent Ferrells escape. Each agency’s policy on use of deadly force (discharging a firearm is deadly force) varies and it should be said that many agencies have dropped the practice of shooting at vehicle tires because more often than not, it has been found to be ineffective as it does not immobilize a vehicle. In light of the dashcam video however, any other explanation of Montoya’s actions could to be seen as criminal or criminally negligent.

 

Oriana Ferrell, has since been indicted for intentional abuse of a child and aggravated fleeing of a law enforcement officer as a result of the chase as well as possession of drug paraphernalia as a result of two marijuana pipes subsequently found in her vehicle. She has penned an op-ed piece on the incident. You can read it here. In her article, Ferrell claims she fled because DeTravis was beating on the vehicle with his baton and because Montoya was shooting at her. It would seem that she has selectively forgotten the order in which these events occured or why DeTravis was beating on her window to begin with. Montoya, for what it’s worth, did not shoot at the vehicle/Ferrell until after Ferrell began to drive away. All that said, I have doubts this incident will result in any jail time for Ferrell or her son because any trial against them would seem to involve this video.

 

My own opinion is that Ferrell is either willfully ignorant of the law or she doesn’t think it applies to her. From the beginning, she made a stupid decision that set things in motion for everything that followed.  At the same time, I think New Mexico may need to review their police policies and their laws if Montoya’s actions are considered justified. My guess is that at most, Ferrill will be fined as a result of her actions and may face probation. Most officers I have spoken with expect Montoya’s career with New Mexico State Police may be over even if he never faces criminal charges. The reason? There’s no articulable threat to Montoya or any other officer when he opens fire and as mentioned, most agencies have abandoned the practice of shooting at suspects’ tires except under the most dire of circumstances. In Texas, the only agency that we commonly see using the practice anymore is the Texas Department of Safety. Even then, the practice is only employed after a suspect has rammed other vehicles, attempted to run down officers, or otherwise clearly demonstrated homicidal intent with his vehicle. We don’t see that in this case and as a result, most officers I’ve asked, can’t see Montoya remaining employed as a police officer.

-GM

Fourteen-year-old “boy” stalked, raped, and murdered his teacher…

Were this a story of this suspect being shot to death by his intended victim, we’d likely be hearing yet another string of people complaining about a young “boy” being killed. Instead, we have a documented case of a fourteen year old once again demonstrating that age is nothing but a number with respect to whether or not someone can/will do you harm.

According to court documents, Chism followed Ritzer into a bathroom after he pulled on gloves, an act that was captured on a school security camera. He moved her body out of the bathroom in a blue recycle bin on wheels, the documents state.

He then went home to change his bloody clothes and ate lunch at Wendy’s before seeing a Woody Allen movie at Hollywood Hits, a theater not far from his Danvers home which he shares with his mother and two younger sisters, according to police. On the night of Oct. 22, both Ritzer and Chism were reported missing.

via Teen Raped Popular Teacher Before Killing Her, Indictment States – Yahoo News.

Folks, this case happened at the same time we were all arguing about thirteen-year-old, Andy Lopez being shot by a police officer who, many felt should have discounted Lopez as a threat solely due to his age. They argue that just by looking at young Andy, the officer should have known he wouldn’t/couldn’t do the officer any harm. Well, here’s a “kid” not even a year older than Andy Lopez who stalked his teacher. Raped her “with an object,” slashed her throat with a box-cutter, and when he was done with her, stole her underwear and other personal effects before returning home to change clothes, eat lunch, and head out to watch a movie with his family. Are you sure you want to roll with the assumption a “kid” cannot hurt you?

-GM

▶ Piers Morgan left dumbfounded by Actor Richard Dreyfuss’s opinion on Gun Control…

▶ Actor Richard Dreyfuss Opposes Gun Control Advocate Piers Morgan: NRA Not “Villians” – YouTube.

Not “perfect” answer by any stretch but, far better than we might have expected. The key take away for me is that he did not advocate government control of guns. The NRA owned armory concept is a new twist but, it’s not all that far off from the gun clubs that were once common in the United Kingdom where privately owned guns were kept at the club. I’m not willing to swallow the idea of being forced to do that. Still, it was fun to see Pierced Organs get an answer he wasn’t expecting from a Hollywood veteran.

-GM