Typical Left-leaning Local Media Slant on Castle Doctrine

During Sunday’s show (July 1), we mentioned an article by the Houston Chronicle discussing an apparent increase in the number of justified homicides in Texas.  That article can be found here (http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Killings-deemed-justified-are-on-the-rise-in-Texas-3676412.php).

As is typical of the media, they sensationalize the facts and the “expert” opinions they cite are themselves, biased to the left.  Here’s the real deal, in plain English.  The Texas Legislature did not and never has intended to give anyone carte blanche to kill at will.  The only person in Texas at any given time who has the “right” to kill another person is an executioner acting on a signed death warrant from the court.  Everyone else had better be prepared to have their actions reviewed.  If you read the law, it consistently requires that one’s actions be “reasonable.”  Believe it or not; you, as the actor in any given case, don’t get to decide what is and isn’t reasonable.  What is reasonable is decided, at the very least, by a local magistrate or grand jury based on evidence reported to them by the investigating officers.  If you are true billed and formally indicted, a jury of your peers will be tasked with deciding if your actions are reasonable.

As we’ve recently seen in the Raul Rodriguez case, “Stand Your Ground” is NOT an automatic get out of jail free card to shoot anyone, anywhere you see fit.  It’s true, you no longer have a “duty to retreat” but, that change assumes you didn’t go looking for a conflict or otherwise end up in a situation of your own making.  The intent was to clarify one’s right to defend himself if he happened to find himself being attacked away from home.  For example, how does one “safely” retreat if you’re at your office or place of business rather than your home when faced with a deadly threat?  Or if you’re simply out making that late evening, ice cream and pickles, run for a mother to be when you’re accosted in the parking lot?  A lot of folks will say run back to the store but, running isn’t necessarily an option for an elderly person or anyone with a disability let alone those of us lacking a “successful lifestyle body” (i.e. fat boys).

No Surprise Here…The Height of Hypocrisy

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/20/house-republicans-tee-up-imminent-contempt-vote-against-holder/
Obama has invoked executive privilege in an eleventh-hour effort to snatch Eric Holder’s butt out of the frying pan.  Representative Darrell Issa is rightly pressing forward with a contempt vote against Holder who has repeatedly denied, delayed, and generally thumbed his nose at congressional requests regarding the “Fast and Furious” scandal.  I personally was insulted by his assertion that this was all about the fact he’s black.  Racism may indeed be alive and well in America today but, I think it’s a cop out to throw that card in this case.  You are the Attorney General of the United States and you claim you have no knowledge of illegal, immoral, and incompetent operations happening under your watch.  In my book that means you fall into one of two categories as head of the responsible organization; criminally complicit, or terminally incompetent…Pick one and hand in your resignation!

-Gary

Bloomberg Stop and Frisk Tactics Haven’t Curtailed Shootings – Gun News at Guns.com

Bloomberg Stop and Frisk Tactics Haven’t Curtailed Shootings – Gun News at Guns.com.  Bloomberg might as well be a Liberal Democrat.  It seems there is no end to his anti-gun agenda and he’s willing to stomp all over the rest of the Bill of Rights to further that agenda.  The “stop and frisk” policy is perhaps the most egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment by any government in the US.  Who in their right mind would ever want to live in a place where the police don’t need probable cause to detain and search you.There is a place like that in every city or town…It’s called JAIL!

-Gary

We’re suppose to AVOID, not seek, confrontations….

http://www.chron.com/news/article/Texas-jury-convicts-man-in-stand-your-ground-case-3629425.php

Raul Rodriguez went against everything concealed handgun license applicants are told about avoiding unnecessary confrontations.  Folks, it’s not enough to read the “Cliff Notes” version of the class regarding non-violent dispute resolution and use of force. Parroting cute little buzzwords on camera or the 911 tape while being an idiot and seeking a fight rather than avoiding one just provides admissible evidence of you being an idiot.

-Gary

 

 

Homeowner arrested for firing warning shot – Houston weather, traffic, news | FOX 26 | MyFoxHouston

Homeowner arrested for firing warning shot – Houston weather, traffic, news | FOX 26 | MyFoxHouston. A listener asked us about this on Facebook today.  So, I thought I’d post my answer…

“On the warning shot arrest, I can see both sides of that incident and frankly, I think the woman from Crime Stoppers was talking out of her butt. She was right however, when she said that standards of reasonableness are (or should be) applied when police believe an offense has occurred. I quite honestly think the police might have been right on this one based on their explanation that the homeowner did not express a belief he was in immediate danger of bodily harm when he discharged that round.

One must keep in mind that simply displaying a firearm in public, or in front of another person, qualifies as aggravated assault (we don’t have a “brandishing” law in Texas). So the rule of thumb is that if you’re not justified in shooting someone, you aren’t often justified in pointing a gun at them either. At the very least, you must be justified in using force. In this case, the homeowner could argue he was justified in using force (but not deadly force) to prevent a burglary or theft in the nighttime but, discharging the firearm is in fact deadly force (even though he fired into ground) and that’s where he steps beyond the standards of reasonableness applied by the investigating officers.”

– Gary