10 November 2013 Podcast

10 November 2013 Podcast OR http://gunsovertexasradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/20131110GOTR.mp3

Cat’s out of the bag Holder, World’s First 3D Printed Metal Gun Manufactured by Solid Concepts

“We’re proving this is possible, the technology is at a place now where we can manufacture a gun with 3D Metal Printing,” says Kent Firestone, Vice President of Additive Manufacturing at Solid Concepts. “And we’re doing this legally. In fact, as far as we know, we’re the only 3D Printing Service Provider with a Federal Firearms License (FFL). Now, if a qualifying customer needs a unique gun part in five days, we can deliver.”

via World’s First 3D Printed Metal Gun Manufactured by Solid Concepts » Solid Concepts, Inc..

The Federal government shouldn’t be able to touch them on this as they are a licensed manufacturer. But doesn’t mean they won’t try. Still, the concept pioneered by Cody Wilson, Defense Distributed has now been proven a viable manufacturing process by Solid Concepts for the first time in all steel form and it’s functional. With time, the technology may become cheaper and ultimately more accessible but, in the meantime, this also means greater complexity than is possible with current machining methods and greater consistency with less porosity than current casting methods. We might see something truly new and unique come out of the gun industry as a result. This is something to watch.

GM

================================================================

================================================================

World’s First 3D Printed Metal Gun Manufactured by Solid Concepts

Solid Concepts, a world leader in 3D Printing services, manufactures the world’s first 3D Printed Metal Gun.

Austin, TX – Solid Concepts, one of the world leaders in 3D Printing services, has manufactured the world’s first 3D Printed Metal Gun using a laser sintering process and powdered metals. The gun, a 1911 classic design, functions beautifully and has already handled 50 rounds of successful firing. It is composed of 33 17-4 Stainless Steel and Inconel 625 components, and decked with a Selective Laser Sintered (SLS) carbon-fiber filled nylon hand grip. The successful production and functionality of the 1911 3D Printed metal gun proves the viability of 3D Printing for commercial applications.

“We’re proving this is possible, the technology is at a place now where we can manufacture a gun with 3D Metal Printing,” says Kent Firestone, Vice President of Additive Manufacturing at Solid Concepts. “And we’re doing this legally. In fact, as far as we know, we’re the only 3D Printing Service Provider with a Federal Firearms License (FFL). Now, if a qualifying customer needs a unique gun part in five days, we can deliver.”

The metal laser sintering process Solid Concepts used to manufacture the 30+ gun components is one of the most accurate additive manufacturing processes available, and more than accurate enough to build the interchangeable and interfacing parts within the 1911 series gun. The gun proves the tight tolerances laser sintering can meet. Plus, 3D Printed Metal has less porosity issues than an investment cast part and better complexities than a machined part. The 3D Printed gun barrel sees chamber pressures above 20,000 psi every time it is fired. Solid Concepts chose to build the 1911 because the design is public domain.

“The whole concept of using a laser sintering process to 3D Print a metal gun revolves around proving the reliability, accuracy and usability of metal 3D Printing as functional prototypes and end use products,” says Firestone. “It’s a common misconception that 3D Printing isn’t accurate or strong enough, and we’re working to change people’s perspective.”

The 3D Printed metal gun proves that 3D Printing isn’t just making trinkets and Yoda heads. The gun manufactured by Solid Concepts debunks the idea that 3D Printing isn’t a viable solution or isn’t ready for mainstream manufacturing. With the right materials and a company that knows how to best program and maintain their machines, 3D printing is accurate, powerful and here to stay.

Well that didn’t take long…Guns & Ammo fires Dick Metcalf

The damage, unfortunately, is already done. Much like Jim Zumbo before him, Dick Metcalf didn’t just stick his foot in his mouth…He peppered it with lead for seasoning first. I’d like to defend him but, I can’t. The Brady Campaign and the media have already started salivating and run with the headline, screaming, “Guns & Ammo Supports Gun Control!” It will be seen as “proof” that 90% of Americans believe in the Draconian style gun laws and gun bans these people consistently advocate.

Meanwhile, Guns & Ammo has had to go into damage control mode in an attempt to head off the same blood-letting that Recoil magazine saw earlier this year when one of their editors shot himself in the foot with a comment about what guns should and should not be in the hands of civilians. Metcalf was apparently already on his way out at Guns & Ammo but, in an open letter (seen below), Jim Bequett announced that departure schedule has been moved up to right now. Bequett apologized to readers/subscribers and said that Eric R. Poole will be taking over the reigns at Guns & Ammo, effective immediately.

Meanwhile, a number of folks jumped to Metcalf’s defense and I can understand a desire not to eat your own but, folks, we really should be done compromising. Metcalf offered up a liberal’s wetdream of an interpretation of what a “well regulated milita” means and his defenders have done the same saying the National Guard is the modern equivalent there of which brings us right back to the liberal mindset that only the police and military should have guns. We’ve been down this road before, that’s not what the Framers meant or intended. It’s a post for another time but, it is intellectually dishonest to interpret all other rights in the Bill of Rights as being the rights of individuals and then randomly single out the 2nd Amendment as being a “collective” right.

For the record Dick, you can yell “FIRE!” in a crowded theater…There is no law against it but, you do bear criminal/civil responsibility for whatever happens as a result of the misuse of your right to do so. Likewise, there should be no law against owning a firearm (any firearm) but, you can and should bear criminal/civil responsibility for misusing said firearm if you unlawfully harm another person or their property. That’s the way it should be and the only regulation we really should tolerate. Instead, we’ve allowed politicians to slowly eat away at not just the 2nd Amendment but, the entire Bill of Rights such that now, “clenched buttocks” stand in as probable cause for a compulsory colonoscopy when X-Rays and anal probes fail to find drugs.

GM

For those interested, Jim Bequett’s open letter can be seen here:

As editor of “Guns & Ammo,” I owe each and every reader a personal apology.

 

No excuses, no backtracking.

 

Dick Metcalf’s “Backstop” column in the December issue has aroused unprecedented controversy. Readers are hopping mad about it, and some are questioning “Guns & Ammo”’s commitment to the Second Amendment. I understand why.

 

Let me be clear: Our commitment to the Second Amendment is unwavering. It has been so since the beginning. Historically, our tradition in supporting the Second Amendment has been unflinching. No strings attached. It is no accident that when others in the gun culture counseled compromise in the past, hard-core thinkers such as Harlon Carter, Don Kates and Neal Knox found a place and a voice in these pages. When large firearms advocacy groups were going soft in the 1970s, they were prodded in the right direction, away from the pages of “Guns & Ammo.”

 

In publishing Metcalf’s column, I was untrue to that tradition, and for that I apologize. His views do not represent mine — nor, most important, “Guns & Ammo”’s. It is very clear to me that they don’t reflect the views of our readership either.

 

Dick Metcalf has had a long and distinguished career as a gunwriter, but his association with “Guns & Ammo” has officially ended.

 

I once again offer my personal apology. I understand what our valued readers want. I understand what you believe in when it comes to gun rights, and I believe the same thing.

 

I made a mistake by publishing the column. I thought it would generate a healthy exchange of ideas on gun rights. I miscalculated, pure and simple. I was wrong, and I ask your forgiveness.

 

Plans were already in place for a new editor to take the reins of “Guns & Ammo” on January 1. However, these recent events have convinced me that I should advance that schedule immediately.

 

Your new “Guns & Ammo” editor will be Eric R. Poole, who has so effectively been running our special interest publications, such as “Book of the AR-15” and “TRIGGER.” You will be hearing much more about this talented editor soon.

 

“Guns & Ammo” will never fail to vigorously lead the struggle for our Second Amendment rights, and with vigorous young editorial leadership such as Eric’s, it will be done even better in the future.

 

Respectfully,

Jim Bequette

via Our Response to the December 2013 Backpage Column – Guns & Ammo.

Guns not actually banned in neighborhood watch program George Zimmerman belonged to – U.S. News

“We’re not asking anyone to take their second amendment, or their concealed weapons rights away from them,”

via Guns not actually banned in neighborhood watch program George Zimmerman belonged to – U.S. News.

Gee, Chief…Back track often? Just last week you’d said anyone participating in a neighborhood watch would not be allowed to carry. I get it. You have to cover your butt and that of the city. If you endorse people carrying, you think that puts the city on the hook when someone get’s shot.  It doesn’t but, that’s the angle you’ll work.  It’s not the first time we’ve heard similar policies associated with neighborhood watch programs for that reason.  It’s also not the first time a police chief voiced a desire to limit 2nd Amendment rights and realized he’d just swallowed his own foot.

-GM

Study finds racism, gun ownership linked in U.S. – Houston Chronicle

Yup, you read that headline right and I’m not really sure if I can bash my head against the desk hard enough to make sense of this one. According to this study, I am the most racist, self-hating man walking the planet. Why? Researchers who don’t even live in the U.S. (they’re from the United Kingdom and Australia) have determined…

“…”symbolic” racism, or racial resentment, was significantly related to having a gun in the home, after adjusting for other variables.”

Now don’t get me wrong. I do hate people. All kinds in fact. Black, white, yellow, brown, red, green, especially those purple sons of bitches with the green dots everywhere that just isn’t right. But I don’t hate them or get nervous around them or about them because of their race. I don’t own guns because I fear blacks, whites, or anyone else. I fear no man, period. I don’t use politically correct code words like “ethnic” to refer to everyone who isn’t white or call anyone who is white a “creepy ass cracka” even if they are from Florida or Georgia and happen to be a little creepy.

No, it’s the stupid I hate and it’s stupid I fear. Stupid people come up with stupid theories and then concoct statistics to back them up. Stupid people sometimes lead to stupid laws being passed or worse, stupid riots that get people killed. So it’s not race that concerns me…It’s stupidity. Right now, there are some idiots publishing stupidity in the UK and Australia…I hate them for being stupid. You can read the full article at the link below. Hold your nose…They’ve piled the bovine excrement pretty high and deep.

Study finds racism, gun ownership linked in U.S. – Houston Chronicle.