Fourteen-year-old “boy” stalked, raped, and murdered his teacher…

Were this a story of this suspect being shot to death by his intended victim, we’d likely be hearing yet another string of people complaining about a young “boy” being killed. Instead, we have a documented case of a fourteen year old once again demonstrating that age is nothing but a number with respect to whether or not someone can/will do you harm.

According to court documents, Chism followed Ritzer into a bathroom after he pulled on gloves, an act that was captured on a school security camera. He moved her body out of the bathroom in a blue recycle bin on wheels, the documents state.

He then went home to change his bloody clothes and ate lunch at Wendy’s before seeing a Woody Allen movie at Hollywood Hits, a theater not far from his Danvers home which he shares with his mother and two younger sisters, according to police. On the night of Oct. 22, both Ritzer and Chism were reported missing.

via Teen Raped Popular Teacher Before Killing Her, Indictment States – Yahoo News.

Folks, this case happened at the same time we were all arguing about thirteen-year-old, Andy Lopez being shot by a police officer who, many felt should have discounted Lopez as a threat solely due to his age. They argue that just by looking at young Andy, the officer should have known he wouldn’t/couldn’t do the officer any harm. Well, here’s a “kid” not even a year older than Andy Lopez who stalked his teacher. Raped her “with an object,” slashed her throat with a box-cutter, and when he was done with her, stole her underwear and other personal effects before returning home to change clothes, eat lunch, and head out to watch a movie with his family. Are you sure you want to roll with the assumption a “kid” cannot hurt you?

-GM

▶ Piers Morgan left dumbfounded by Actor Richard Dreyfuss’s opinion on Gun Control…

▶ Actor Richard Dreyfuss Opposes Gun Control Advocate Piers Morgan: NRA Not “Villians” – YouTube.

Not “perfect” answer by any stretch but, far better than we might have expected. The key take away for me is that he did not advocate government control of guns. The NRA owned armory concept is a new twist but, it’s not all that far off from the gun clubs that were once common in the United Kingdom where privately owned guns were kept at the club. I’m not willing to swallow the idea of being forced to do that. Still, it was fun to see Pierced Organs get an answer he wasn’t expecting from a Hollywood veteran.

-GM

Hijacking a legacy with an outright lie…

Liberal lie...Wow, leave it to liberals to hijack a man’s legacy with an outright lie and a cartoon done in poor taste. The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence posted a “cartoon” (right) to Facebook today saying, “Don’t worry Mr. President. We are not done yet. #gunviolence#gunsense #gunsafety”

 

Regardless of your politics, there were some things Kennedy got right. For all his faults, he was not an evil man and not since Reagan have we had a president who preached that we shouldn’t be looking for a government handout but, looking to do our best for our country. But on the issue of guns, I can find only one verifiable quote from Kennedy on short notice. It appeared, of all places, in Guns Magazine.

http://www.gunsmagazine.com/1960issues/G0460.pdf

Sen. John F. Kennedy’s statement, Know Your Lawmakers, Guns, April 1960, p. 4 (1960): “By calling attention to ‘a well regulated militia,’ the ‘security’ of the nation, and the right of each citizen ‘to keep and bear arms,’ our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to the Second Amendment will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason I believe the Second Amendment will always be important.”

By today’s standards, Kennedy would be considered a Tea Party “terrorist” with respect to the issue of guns.

-GM

17 November 2013 Podcast

17 November 2013 Podcast or http://gunsovertexasradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/20131117GOTR.mp3

Suspect’s family angry at Good Samaritan, police | Fox10tv.com

“If his (the customer) life was not in danger, if no one had a gun up to him, if no one pointed a gun at him – what gives him the right to think that it’s okay to just shoot someone?” said the relative. “You should have just left the store and went wherever you had to go in your car or whatever.”

via Suspect’s family angry at Good Samaritan, police | Fox10tv.com.

No, your f*cktard relative shouldn’t have tried to murder and rob another person. And the fact we have people who can shape their mouths to make the above statement and think it reasonable, is truly pathetic. People like this make the case for abortion…Retroactive abortion.

-Gary